Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add < and > operators for string comparison #7315

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

jfinkels
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #7254.

Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/stdbuf (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/test/test is no longer failing!

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

would it be possible to add tests with more complex string ? utf8 char, broken input, etc?
thanks

@jfinkels
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added just a few more, including strings with spaces, strings of different lengths, empty strings, and Unicode.

Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/stdbuf (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/test/test is no longer failing!
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/test/test is no longer failing!
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@cakebaker cakebaker force-pushed the test-string-comparison-lt-gt branch from 985c82a to d8058f2 Compare February 21, 2025 10:41
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/stdbuf (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/test/test is no longer failing!

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

Congrats! The gnu test tests/test/test is no longer failing!

ouhlala :)

@cakebaker cakebaker merged commit 4acc59d into uutils:main Feb 21, 2025
65 checks passed
@cakebaker
Copy link
Contributor

Congrats! The gnu test tests/test/test is no longer failing!

Great, thanks :)

sylvestre pushed a commit to sylvestre/coreutils that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
* test: add < and > operators for string comparison

Fixes uutils#7254.

* Add more tests for string inequality

* Use match in place of if/elseif block

Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <[email protected]>

* Change test name to specify lt/gt operator

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel Hofstetter <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test: errors on '<' operator
3 participants